博文
SCI投稿常用英语
|||
摘自：http://forum.e2002.com/thread-187286-1-7.html
1. Dear Dr. Defendi ML:
I am sending a manuscript entitled “” by – which I should like to submit for possible publication in the journal of - .
Yours sincerely
2. Dear Dr. A:
Enclosed is a manuscript entitled “” by sb, which we are submitting for publication in the journal of - . We have chosen this journal because it deals with - . We believe that sth would be of interest to the journal’s readers.
3. Dear Dr. A:
Please find enclosed for your review an original research article, “” by sb. All authors have read and approve this version of the article, and due care has been taken to ensure the integrity of the work. No part of this paper has published or submitted elsewhere. No conflict of interest exits in the submission of this manuscript, and we have attached to this letter the signed letter granting us permission to use Figure 1 from another source.
We appreciate your consideration of our manuscript, and we look forward to receiving comments from the reviewers.
二、询问有无收到稿件
Dear Editors,
We dispatched our manuscript to your journal on 3 August 2006 but have not, as yet, receive acknowledgement of their safe arrival. We fear that may have been lost and should be grateful if you would let us know whether or not you have received them. If not, we will send our manuscript again. Thank you in advance for your help.
三、询问论文审查回音
Dear Editors，
It is more than 12 weeks since I submitted our manuscript (No: ) for possible publication in your journal. I have not yet received a reply and am wondering whether you have reached a decision. I should appreciated your letting me know what you have decided as soon as possible.
四、关于论文的总体审查意见
1. This is a carefully done study and the findings are of considerable interest. A few minor revision are list below.
2. This is a well-written paper containing interesting results which merit publication. For the benefit of the reader, however, a number of points need clarifying and certain statements require further justification. There are given below.
3. Although these observation are interesting, they are rather limited and do not advance our knowledge of the subject sufficiently to warrant publication in PNAS. We suggest that the authors try submitting their findings to specialist journal such as –
4. Although this paper is good, it would be ever better if some extra data were added.
5. This manuscript is not suitable for publication in the journal of – because the main observation it describe was reported 3 years ago in a reputable journal of - .
6. Please ask someone familiar with English language to help you rewrite this paper. As you will see, I have made some correction at the beginning of the paper where some syntax is not satisfactory.
7. We feel that this potentially interesting study has been marred by an inability to communicate the finding correctly in English and should like to suggest that the authors seek the advice of someone with a good knowledge of English, preferable native speaker.
8. The wording and style of some section, particularly those concerning HPLC, need careful editing. Attention should be paid to the wording of those parts of the Discussion of and Summary which have been underlined.
9. Preliminary experiments only have been done and with exception of that summarized in Table 2, none has been repeated. This is clearly unsatisfactory, particularly when there is so much variation between assays.
10. The condition of incubation are poorly defined. What is the temperature? Were antibody used?
五、给编辑的回信
1. In reply to the referee’s main criticism of paper, it is possible to say that –
One minor point raised by the referee concerns of the extra composition of the reaction mixture in Figure 1. This has now been corrected. Further minor changes had been made on page 3, paragraph 1 (line 3-8) and 2 (line 6-11). These do not affect our interpretation of the result.
2. I have read the referee’s comments very carefully and conclude that the paper has been rejected on the sole grounds that it lake toxicity data. I admit that I did not include a toxicity table in my article although perhaps I should have done. This was for the sake of brevity rather than an error or omission.
3. Thank you for your letter of – and for the referee’s comments concerning our manuscript entitled “”. We have studied their comments carefully and have made correction which we hope meet with their approval.
4. I enclosed a revised manuscript which includes a report of additional experiments done at the referee’s suggestion. You will see that our original findings are confirmed.
5. We are sending the revised manuscript according to the comments of the reviewers. Revised portion are underlined in red.
6. We found the referee’s comments most helpful and have revised the manuscript
7. We are pleased to note the favorable comments of reviewers in their opening sentence.
8. Thank you for your letter. I am very pleased to learn that our manuscript is acceptable for publication in Cancer Research with minor revision.
9. We have therefore completed a further series of experiments, the result of which are summarized in Table 5. From this we conclude that intrinsic factor is not account.
10. We deleted the relevant passage since they are not essential to the contents of the paper.
11. I feel that the reviewer’s comments concerning Figures 1 and 2 result from a misinterpretation of the data.
12. We would have include a non-protein inhibitor in our system, as a control, if one had been available.
13. We prefer to retain the use of Table 4 for reasons that it should be clear from the new paragraph inserted at the end of the Results section.
14. Although reviewer does not consider it is important to measure the temperature of the cells, we consider it essential.
15. The running title has been changed to “”.
16. The Materials and Methods section now includes details for measuring uptake of isotope and assaying hexokinase.
17. The concentration of HAT media (page12 paragraph 2) was incorrectly stated in the original manuscript. This has been rectified. The authors are grateful to the referees for pointing out their error.
18. As suggested by both referees, a discussion of the possibility of laser action on chromosome has been included (page16, paragraph 2).
19. We included a new set of photographs with better definition than those originally submitted and to which a scale has been added.
20. Following the suggestion of the referees, we have redraw Figure 3 and 4.
21. Two further papers, published since our original submission, have been added to the text and Reference section. These are:
22. We should like to thank the referees for their helpful comments and hope that we have now produced a more balance and better account of our work. We trust that the revised manuscript is acceptable for publication.
23. I greatly appreciate both your help and that of the referees concerning improvement to this paper. I hope that the revised manuscript is now suitable for publication.
24. I should like to express my appreciation to you and the referees for suggesting how to improve our paper.
25. I apologize for the delay in revising the manuscript. This was due to our doing an additional experiment, as suggested by referees.
|
近几个月来，有三篇文章被SCI源期刊接受发表，虽然心里清楚自己的实际水平不咋地，但还是比较高兴的，总结一下过程供大家参考。说的不对的地方望大家拍砖。觉得有帮助的同学就顶一下。 Dear Prof. xxx(Editor): 2. 收到中期决定 3. 修改后再次上传 4. 收到最终决定 5. 收到版权转让声明以及抽印本订货单. 6. 填好版权转让声明、扫描后发送，信如下： Our reference: xxx 7. 收到校样及Author Query 8. 认真校对、认真填写Author Query后写信: Dear Editor, 9. 耐心等待出版 10. 看到文章挂到网上，得意中 11. 还得继续写文章，痛苦并没有结束。。。 写好后重复第一条 12. 如此循环往复...
|
本人近日侥幸在某SCI索引的外刊发表一篇论文，想在这里浅谈一下发外文的体会，供学弟、学妹们参考。我觉得发外文时主要注意以下几点：
1. 论文中必须至少有一个创新点。创新点或是开创性的工作，或是对原有工作的改进，或是提出一种新方法。老外对公式不是很看重，主要看你是否有创新。
2. 在外刊上发过文章的同学都知道，Introduction部分是最难写的，我认为在这部分中不但要提及题目的意义，别人的研究成果，更重要的是要指出你这篇论文的贡献，以吸引审
稿人的眼球。
3. 标题也很重要，即要新颖又要体现你的论文的主要工作及采用的方法
4. 实验素材要丰富，以数据说话，让人感觉你作了许多工作。
5. 要直接用英文写，学会用英语语言思考问题，不要先写成汉语再翻成英语，这样写出来的东西总有点中国英语的味道，让审稿人看起来不舒服。
6. 平时多看一些牛刊的论文，摘抄一个常用的语句及段落，如开场白、题目的意义、章节安排、语气转折等，活学活用。这样写出来的文章看起来就很漂亮了。
7. 对审稿人提出的修改意见或建议一定要认真对待，尽量满足他们的要求，如你认为某些意见或建议不妥，要在回信中加以阐述。
8. 认真研究所发期刊的参考文献的引用格式。我的一位师兄就是因为这点直接被拒了。
| 怎样写英文投稿信？ |
|
A cover letter is the on On (1)The correspondence information of the correspondent; (2)The title of the manuscript, the numbers of tables, figures, charts, plates and so on; (3)The statement that this manucript has never been partly or wholely published in or submitted to any other journals; (4)The statement that all authors in the manuscript have agreed to submit it to this journal and it's better to have each on (5)The statement that the research in the manuscript has been conducted under the guidance of international ethical standards if the research uses animals as experimental materials; (7)Suggested reviewers you think that are appropriate for this manuscript; (8)The statement on the inapropriate reviewers for this manuscript, and it's better to state the reasons in concise words; (9)Some journals require the authors to briefly introduce his research purposes, methods and results. The following is on Zhang San, Ph D Environment and Architecture School, Sichuan University Mozhiqiao, Ring On The People’s Republic of China Zip co E-mail: abc@yahoo.com.cn Dear Dr. Richard I enclose a manuscript entitled The Preparation of the Monokaryon Protoplast and its Regenration in Oyster Mushroom (Pleurotus ostreatus), which I submit for possible publication in the Jounal of Biosource Technology. All of the authors agree to the submission of this paper. The text includes 20 pages, 3 tables, and 2 figures prepared using Microsoft Word Processing 2003 according to the journal's Instructions to Authors. We have provided all required supporting documentation. We respectfully submit that the following individuals would be suitable peer reviewers based on their expertise in the field: Li Yu, Microbiological Research Institute, Chinese Acadmey of Agricutlureal Sciences. E-mail: li_yu@yahoo.cn Zhang Jun, Resources and Environmental Protection School, Sichuan Agricultural University. E-mail: zhangjun@yahoo.cn Chen Wei, School of Horticulture, China Agricultural University. E-mail: chenwei@yahoo.cn In recent years, our research group has had some conflicts with Li Haha and Wang Chuachua in Sichuan Institute of Microbiology in project application. We request that these individuals not be consulted. We thank you for considering this work and look forward to your response. Please direct all correspondence about this manuscript to me (or Dr. Zhang San, e-amil: Zhangsan@yahoo.cn). Sincerely Zhang Shan e-mail: zhangsan@yahoo.com.cn The following are all the authors in this paper and their signature. Zhang San XXX Li Si XXX Wang Wu XXX Yang Yu XXX
More examples about how to write a cover letter! COVER LETTER（投稿信）实用指南
来源于：http://www.sciencenet.cn/blog/user_content.aspx?id=9079
1、 什么是cover letter？ 指的是投稿信 2、cover letter的内容主要包括那些？ 应该简述所投稿件的核心内容、主要发现和意义，拟投期刊，对稿件处理有无特殊要求等（如“not to review” list）。另外，请附上主要作者的中文姓名、通讯地址、电话、传真和e-mail地址。此外有的杂志要求推荐几位审稿人及其联系方式。以及谁已经阅读过该文（当然是牛人）。 有的杂志要求作者写明你没有一搞多投，此外临床实验要求写明符合伦理学要求等。 3、 如何写cover letter？ 各个杂志的具体要求是不一样的，在杂志的guide for authors一般会有要求。如果没有具体的要求，大家可按照通用要求处理。 4、常用模板： （1） Cover letter Dear Mr. ** 1. The work described has not been submitted elsewhere for publication, in whole or in part, and all the authors listed have approved the manuscript that is enclosed. 2. I have read and have abided by the statement of ethical standards for manuscripts submitted to Neuroscience. kind regards. Your sincerely, 通讯作者 （2） Dear Dr. 主编name: We submit our manuscript entitled " 文章title" to 杂志名for publication. 接着简单介绍你文章的主要创新点和意义，不易过多，但要突出新意和关键点。 All authors have seen the manuscript and approved to submit to your journal. Thank you very much for your attention and consideration. Sincerely yours, 通讯作者 （3） Dear Dr. 主编name: We submit our manuscript entitled " 文章title" to 杂志名for publication. 接着简单介绍你文章的主要创新点和意义，不易过多，但要突出新意和关键点。 All authors have seen the manuscript and approved to submit to your journal. Thank you very much for your attention and consideration. Sincerely yours, 通讯作者 （4）Dr. *** Editor-in-Chief, *** (add address) January 22, 2003 Dear Dr. **, Enclosed herewith please find 3 copies of a MS by: ‘***. *** and ***’ entitled: “**********”, which we would like to submit for publication in the ‘******'. Looking forward to your decision, With kind personal regards, Sincerely yours, ***** Professor of *** （5） Dear Prof. Gil: This is a manuscript by**and **entitled “.......”. It is submitted to be considered for publication as a “...” in your journal. This paper is new. Neither the entire paper nor any part of its content has been published or has been accepted elsewhere. It is not being submitted to any other journal. We believe the paper may be of particular interest to the readers of your journal as it ........ Correspondence should be addressed to **at the following address, phone and fax number, and email address: ... Thanks very much for your attention to our paper. Sincerely yours, ** （6） Date: Sep 15, 2003 Dear Editors: On behalf of my co-authors, I am submitting the enclosed material “ TITLE ” for possible publication in JOURNAL. We certify that we have participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility for the appropriateness of the experimental design and method, and the collection, analysis, and interpretation of the da We have reviewed the final version of the manuscript and approve it for publication. To the best of our knowledge and belief, this manuscript has not been published in whole or in part nor is it being considered for publication elsewhere. Best Regards. Yours Sincerely, NAME,ADRESS,EMAIL,FAX （7） Dear Dr Regino Perez-Polo： Enclosed are a manuscript by su jian, yang kun, chen zhihua．Su jian titled“Hypothermia after Acute Ischemic Stroke ”． It is submitted to be considered for publication as a“review" in your journal．This paper is～?Neither the entire paper nor any part of its content has been published or has been accepted elsewhere ．It is not being submitted to any other journal． We believe the paper may be of particular interest to the readers of your journal. Correspondence and phone calls about the paper should be directed to Su jian at the following address，phone and fax number，and e-mail address： Su jian Institute:, Adress: Tel： Fax: E-mail： Thanks very much for your attention to our paper． Sincerely yours， Su jian （8） Dear Editor, We would like to submit the enclosed manuscript entitled "GDNF Acutely Modulates Neuronal Excitability and A-type Potassium Channels in Midbrain Dopaminergic Neurons", which we wish to be considered for publication in Nature Neuroscience. GDNF has long been thought to be a potent neurotrophic factor for the survival of midbrain dopaminergic neurons, which are degenerated in Parkinson’s disease. In this paper, we report an unexpected, acute effect of GDNF on A-type potassium channels, leading to a potentiation of neuronal excitability, in the dopaminergic neurons in culture as well as in adult brain slices. Further, we show that GDNF regulates the K+ channels through a mechanism that involves activation of MAP kinase. Thus, this study has revealed, for the first time, an acute modulation of ion channels by GDNF. Our findings challenge the classic view of GDNF as a long-term survival factor for midbrain dopaminergic neurons, and suggest that the normal function of GDNF is to regulate neuronal excitability, and consequently dopamine release. These results may also have implications in the treatment of Parkinson’s disease. Due to a direct competition and conflict of interest, we request that Drs. XXX of Harvard Univ., and YY of Yale Univ. not be considered as reviewers. With thanks for your consideration, I am Sincerely yours, （9） Dear **. We would like to submit the enclosed manuscript entitled " *** ", which we wish to be considered for publication in **journal. We believe that two aspects of this manuscript will make it interesting to general readers of **journal. First, ***. Second, ***. Further, ***. Thank you very much your considering our manuscript for potential publication. I'm looking forward to hearing from you soon. Best wishes. （10） To: SOLA Chief Editor Division of Geoenvironmental Sciences University of Tsukuba Tsukuba 305-8572, JAPAN E-Mail: sola@sakura.cc.tsukuba.ac.jp Dear Sirs, I am sending herewith a copy of the manuscript, which I would like to submit to SOLA, the Electronic Journal of the Meteorological Society of Japan. The paper is entitled: Energy Spectrum Proportional to the Squared Phase Speed of Rossby Modes in the General Circulation of the Atmosphere by H. L. Tanaka, Yasushi Watarai, and Takahiro Kanda. Copy of the Abstract: In this study, energy spectrum of the large-scale atmospheric motions is examined in the framework of the 3D normal mode decomposition. The horizontal scale of disturbance is measured by the phase speed of a Rossby mode c. According to the analysis result for the barotropic component of the atmosphere, we obtain a characteristic energy spectrum with distinct slopes for the turbulence and wave regimes separated by the spherical Rhines speed. In order to explain the observational finding that the energy spectrum is proportional to c^2, we put forward a hypothesis based on the criterion of Rossby wave breaking such that the local meridional gradient of potential vorticity becomes negative, dq/dy < 0, somewhere in the domain. With a constant m describing a total mass of the atmosphere for unit area, we have shown that the barotropic energy spectrum of the general circulation E can be represented as E=mc^2. Corresponding Author: Dr. Hiroshi L. Tanaka Division of Geoenvironmental Sciences University of Tsukuba Tsukuba 305-8572, JAPAN Tel: +81-29-853-4502 Fax: +81-29-853-6879 E-Mail: tanaka@sakura.cc.tsukuba.ac.jp I hereby certify that this paper consists of original, unpublished work which is not under consideration for publication elsewhere. Desired Editors in Charge: Kimoto, Masahide University of Tokyo Mak, Mankin University of Illinois Five Potential Reviewers: Name-1, e-mail address-1 Name-2, e-mail address-2 Name-3, e-mail address-3 Name-4, e-mail address-4 Name-5, e-mail address-5 The original manuscript and figures will be transferred, following the instruction by the Editorial Committee when the paper is accepted. I hope your favorable consideration for publication to SOLA. Sincerely, Hiroshi L. Tanaka Attachment: PDF file of the manuscript. |
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
| 向国内和国外SCI投稿的几点感触 |
|
早就想写一写自己的科研经历了，只是一直觉得自己的资质可能不够怕误导了大家。今年6月就要博士毕业，论文刚写完。因为要继续在中科院留所工作，感觉没太大压力。也该把过去几年的科研经历总结一下了，希望对别人也有帮助吧。 中国总是喊口号说要高改革，建立优秀期刊，提高科研水平。结果现在国内科研水平不高，期刊更差，即便好 稿子都到国外了，甚至以投国际ＳＣＩ稿子为极大光荣，单位也鼓励，例如，有不少单位在网站的论文快报栏里只提供国际ＳＣＩ论文。当然，上层掌权人士想法总是好的，但要是不切实际，我所作为，那都无济于事。 有个留过洋的朋友告诉我，老外对参考文献置信度顺序，从低到高一般是：中国人写的国内刊出的，中国人写的国内刊出但有老外参加的，中国人写的在国外刊出的，中国人写的在国外刊出有老外参加的，老外写的国内刊出，老外写的国外刊出。听了之后真的不舒服，老外偏见的确可恨，可国人呢？ 我也给国内ＳＣＩ期刊的编辑部提出几点自己的小建议，仅供参考：（１）稿件一定要找方向相关的人审稿；（２）国内没有专家的稿子，请国外专家审；（３）编辑视情况给国内稿子找一个以上老外审稿； 另外，还有一重要方面，如果实行，定有益处：强化和鼓励国内审稿人的责任感，例如，鼓励通过的稿件在刊出时的体现审稿人名字，文章以后被引用的次数也作为审稿人的荣誉加以提倡，当然无形中也限制了审稿人的不负责任的作为（随便通过一篇差的稿子或枪毙一篇优秀的稿子都是得不偿失的）。当然科研人员的能拿出手的审稿数也是个不错的个人荣誉认证。 |
SCI系列讲座之一——认识SCI
http://player.youku.com/player.php/partnerid/XOTcy/sid/XMTU2NjUyNjQw/v.swf">
SCI系列讲座之二——利用ISI Web of Knowledge轻松开题
http://player.youku.com/player.php/partnerid/XOTcy/sid/XMTU2NjU1NjI0/v.swf">
SCI系列讲座之三——利用ISI Web of Knowledge快乐写作
http://player.youku.com/player.php/partnerid/XOTcy/sid/XMTU2NjM4MjM2/v.swf">
SCI系列讲座之四——利用ISI Web of Knowledge有效投稿
http://player.youku.com/player.php/partnerid/XOTcy/sid/XMTU2Njc4NTcy/v.swf">
SCI系列讲座之五——利用ResearcherID展示成果
http://player.youku.com/player.php/partnerid/XOTcy/sid/XMTU2Njc5NjEy/v.swf">
https://blog.sciencenet.cn/blog-39358-24973.html
上一篇：Elsevier科技论文写作培训大纲
下一篇：国外科技论文写作资源
