构建全球华人科学博客圈(blog)http://www.sciencenet.cn/blog
博主
王鸿飞的博客
中国科学院化学研究所分子科学国家实验室分子反应动力学实验室
加为好友 | 发短消息
加为好友 | 发短消息
用户入口
公告栏
版权所有 请勿转载 允许链接 谢谢!

个人主页:http://mrdlab.iccas.ac.cn/zwb/yjry/whf.html

栏目分类
所有文章RSS761
未来世界5
广而告之9
一家之言47
读书学艺33
大地人文79
大学之道147
科普科普15
自言自语87
人文科学11
八年抗战8
影音爱好53
大众评论70
奇闻逸事51
教育科研87
科学人文59
最新日志
陈安学弟这个社会牛虻02-09
领导内部讲话:绝大多数...02-08
暗物质和派克式左轮02-07
去南非过年02-07
建设一流大学的最大问题02-05
关于“台湾杰出科学家清...02-05
一流大学建设:总理必读02-04
路遥知马力,日久见人心02-03
“吃人”还是“吃自己”02-02
呼唤中国科学的脊梁02-01
最新评论
社会牛虻,挺传神的,嘿...02-10
看这个主题的新闻其实没...02-09
ding~!
...
02-09
绝大多数干部的功能很正...02-09
职在惩治犯罪的司法人员...02-09
博主评论
博主留言
在这给我留言吧>>
很喜欢您主页播放的几首...01-14
鸿飞老师,以前在你的博...01-12
我国的数据库,用来进行...01-03
祝王老师新年快乐,万事...01-01
王叔叔,
01-01
博主收藏
>我的相册
友情链接
MaZhen的博客
黄健翔新浪博客
黄岩谊的博客
黎明前的舞蹈-滕彪新浪博客
李承鹏新浪博客
李虎军的博客
李开复之开复学生网
李淼的博客
饶毅的博客
施一公的博客
熊伟的博客
博主好友
统计数据
访问:3958635次
日志:759篇
评论:14601个
留言:233个
建站时间:2007-1-20 10:56:16  
最近访客
梅珍生
刘岩
何学锋
卫军英
程木
郭桅
刘先国
李京忠
李万峰
崔雷
正文
<< 上一篇 下一篇 >>

学者王鸿飞 发表于2009-11-25 15:05:32
查看评论:8 │ 浏览:2617   打印   推荐给朋友

大学之道
美国《商业周刊》关于千人计划最新报道(转贴)

美国《商业周刊》关于千人计划最新报道(转贴)

2009.11.25

这个报道没有太多新内容。It is just nice to know.

其中的Wei Jia,即科学网上的博主贾伟博士。

2009年11月19日Business Week《China's Reverse Brain Drain》文章链接:http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/09_48/b4157058821350.

**************************************

China's Reverse Brain Drain
Beijing is making progress in its effort to lure back top Chinese scientists working overseas

By Pete Engardio 

Beijing - The lab equipment is still being installed in the new life sciences school at Beijing's Tsinghua University. But the hallways are already lined with posters heralding an early achievement: the hiring of Chinese faculty from Stanford, Harvard, and other elite institutions overseas. The mission, says Dean Shi Yigong, a former Princeton professor who is a pioneer in the study of cell death, is to build a world-class research center to "solve the basic mysteries of biology."

Shi is one of the biggest catches in a mounting campaign to lure China's brightest minds back home. Last year, Beijing launched the Thousand Talents Program, offering top scientists grants of 1 million yuan (about $146,000), fat salaries, and generous lab funding.

The goal is to address the biggest roadblock to China's aspirations of becoming an innovation powerhouse: an acute shortage of seasoned research scientists. Accomplished physicists, biologists, and mathematicians—who might produce technological breakthroughs and build key research programs—have long balked at low pay and a university system marred by corruption, cronyism, and lax standards. But now, China's economic boom and surging government investment in research are making mainland university posts more attractive. A decade ago, only 1 in 100 leading Chinese scientists in the U.S. would have considered returning, says Rao Yi, a former Northwestern neuroscience professor who is dean of Peking University's life sciences school. Today, he says, half would. "Now, there is a chance of recruiting the rising stars of Harvard," says Rao.

Higher pay helps, but returnees say the main allure is the chance to build a science program from the ground up. While U.S. labs are struggling for funds, China is expanding. Shi says he earns less in China than at Princeton, where he ran a structural biology lab and helped found a drug-discovery company. But at Tsinghua, he helped design a life sciences program with 1,500 students. So far, Shi has hired 22 scientists from the U.S. to set up labs and has made offers to an additional 15.

HUGE PAY DISPARITIES

Sometimes the perks lavished on returnees can create tension with existing faculty. Wei Jia, an expert in using modern science to study traditional Chinese medicine, says his annual pay package at Shanghai's Jiatong University was worth about $10,000. "It really is irritating that the good pay is reserved for people who are still in the U.S.," Wei says. Last year, Wei left Shanghai to run a new research center at the University of North Carolina, where his package is in six figures.

There are still many holdouts. Carnegie Mellon University electrical engineering professor Jimmy Zhu was tempted by his alma mater in Wuhan with a $140,000 salary, subsidized housing, and more than $1 million to start a lab. But Zhu decided to stay at CMU, in part because he doesn't think "the scientific environment has matured enough to promote real innovation." Also, Chinese officials tend to award grants based on personal connections rather than scientific merit.

Returnees are trying to change that. Tsinghua, for instance, now makes longer-term grants to top scientists, allowing them wider latitude to conduct truly innovative research. And a new curriculum will focus more on problem-solving than rote learning, Shi says. As such changes take root, he says, China should acquire a knack for turning theoretical research into high-tech products. "When you have the right people," he predicts, "changes will happen spontaneously."

Engardio is an international senior writer for BusinessWeek.

本文引用地址: http://www.sciencenet.cn/m/user_content.aspx?id=273832
当前推荐数:2    推荐人: Wuyishan  littlejoy  
[8] 标题:
发表评论人:tianfuwang86 [2009-11-30 8:25:32]   
我也跟我们学校的几个老师谈过回国的问题,大部分人(工科)对国内的薪水(包括项目收入),实验室条件其实还可以接受,但是考虑到小孩的教育和发展问题,很多人都打退堂鼓。
[7] 标题:
发表评论人:weijia2009 [2009-11-26 2:43:30]   
6楼说得对,文中学校也没写对。
[6] 标题:
发表评论人:[游客]UNC [2009-11-26 2:15:15] ip:152.16.103.*  
Dr. Jia is with University of North Carolina at Greensboro. When people say UNC, it is usually meant to say?University of North Carolina Chapel Hill.
[5] 标题:
发表评论人:weijia2009 [2009-11-26 0:52:35]   
那句话并非出自我的口中,但我想也没啥大问题。这个叫Pete Engardio的几周前给我打了电话,其中一个问题是他在北京和上海听很多人说高校教授工资水平很低,只有这个数,我说基本属实,我当时的待遇就是这个范围。然后这位仁兄就写成这样了,其他(我认为很重要的)问题和回答均未写。
博主回复:嘿嘿,理解。

记者写了,编辑也不一定不删改。哪里比得上在这里写博客这么自由?
[4] 标题:
发表评论人:[游客]guoke [2009-11-25 23:44:21] ip:160.94.47.*  
交大也太抠门了吧,$10000在上海怎么活啊?
[3] 标题:
发表评论人:[游客]youke [2009-11-25 21:55:27] ip:71.190.68.*  
你应该把施一公那张照片也贴上
博主回复:谢谢!

我一般不转贴人家文章上的照片,除非离开了照片文字的意义已经无法让人看懂。
[2] 标题:[此为悄悄话]
发表评论人:nli2233 [2009-11-25 16:56:35]   
[此为悄悄话]
[1] 标题:
发表评论人:nli2233 [2009-11-25 15:19:38]   
笔误:是商业周刊,不是新闻周刊。
博主回复:谢谢!已经改了。
记录总数:8 总页数:1 当前页:193[1]4:
发表评论:
用户名: 必填
电子邮箱:  
验证码