| [9] 标题：德国网站称美德政府与达赖合导西藏闹剧(原文) |
| 发表评论人：[游客]dna [2008-4-17 10:17:47] |
http://www.german-foreign-policy.com/en/fulltext/56145
The Olympic Torch Relay Campaign
2008/04/08
LHASA/BERLIN
(Own report) - Conference reports and the research of a Canadian journalist reveal that a German Foreign Ministry front organization is playing a decisive role in the preparations of the anti-Chinese Tibet campaign. According to this information, the campaign is being orchestrated from a Washington based headquarters. It had been assigned the task of organizing worldwide "protests" at a conference organized by the Friedrich Naumann Foundation (affiliated with the German Free Democratic Party - FDP) in May 2007. The plans were developed with the collaboration of the US State Department and the self-proclaimed Tibetan Government in Exile and call for high profile actions along the route of the Olympic Torch Relay and are supposed to reach a climax in August during the games in Beijing. The campaign began already last summer and is now profiting from the current uprising in the west of the People's Republic of China that is receiving prominent coverage in the German media. The uprising was initiated with murderous pogrom-like attacks by Tibetan gangs on non-Tibetan members of the population, including the Muslim Chinese minority. Numerous deaths of non-Tibetans provoked a reaction of the Chinese security forces.
According to the research by a Canadian journalist, a conference organized by the Friedrich Naumann Foundation (FNSt) gave the impetus to the current anti-Chinese Tibet campaign that violently forced the interruption of the Olympian Torch Relay in Paris last Monday.[1] The conference was the fifth "International Tibet Support Groups Conference," that was held from May 11 - 14, 2007 in Brussels. According to FNSt information this conference was supposed to do nothing other than the four preceding conferences [2] - "coordinate the work of the international Tibet groups and consolidate the links between them with the central Tibetan Government in Exile."[3] The German foundation, which is largely state financed, began the conference preparations in March 2005, and coordinated its plans with the Dalai Lama at his headquarters in the self-proclaimed Tibetan Government in Exile in Dharamsala, India. More than 300 participants from 56 countries, 36 Tibetan associations and 145 Tibet support groups were represented at the conference.
Roadmap
After several days of consultations the conference ended with a concerted "plan of action". The paper is entitled "Roadmap for the Tibet Movement for the Coming Years" covering four areas of interest: "political support for negotiations", "human rights", "environment and development" and "the 2008 Olympic games in Beijing." The results of the conference are directed to the Tibetan people as well as "their supporters around the world."[4] Rolf Berndt, a member of the FNSt's executive council in Brussels, declared that the Olympic Games "are an excellent opportunity" to publicly promote the cause of the "Tibet Movement".[5] The conference participants agreed to make the Olympics the single focus of attack for their activities for the next 15 months.[6] They hired a full-time organizer for their campaign, who has since been directing the worldwide Tibet actions from their Washington headquarters.
State Department
The decisions taken at the conference in Brussels, prepared by the Friedrich Naumann Foundation, are particularly significant not only because of the large number of participants but also because of the influential politicians who helped in their formulation. For example the self-proclaimed Tibetan Government in Exile, which enjoys much prestige among separatists, was represented by its "Prime Minister" Samdong Rinpoche. Also attending was another eminent politician from the Indian Himachal Pradesh state, bordering on the People's Republic of China, where the town Dharamsala is located, the "seat" of the Tibetan "Government in Exile." A brisk interchange takes place between Himachan Pradesh and the Chinese autonomous region of Tibet. Paula Dobriansky, the Undersecretary of State in the US State Department and special coordinator for Tibet questions also participated. She was a member of the National Security Council already in the Reagan Administration, continued her career in the State Department during the administration of President Bush Sr. and since 2001 was again in the US foreign ministry. Ms Drobriansky is considered to be one of the members of the neo-conservative inner circle in the Bush Administration and ranks as a hard-liner capable of imposing policy.
Every Day
As a Canadian journalist learned through his research, the campaign headquarters in Washington, that had been decided upon at the conference in Brussels, has been able to develop rather successful activities. Already at the beginning of August 2007, exactly one year before the opening of the Olympics, a close associate organized a high profile action at the tourist filled Great Wall to the north of Beijing. She maintains close contact to the Tibetan "Government in Exile".[7] Another close associate recently orchestrated the disturbance of the Olympic Torch Relay in Greece, seen on television around the world. The Washington headquarters is orchestrating other "protests" intended to disturb the Torch Relay. The campaign will reach its climax during the Olympic games in August. "We are determined to have non-violent direct action in the heart of Beijing, inside the Games, every day," one activist declared.[8]
Merciless
The anti-Chinese Tibet campaign, initiated under the direction of a German Foreign Ministry front organization (Friedrich Naumann Foundation) and a high-ranking representative of the US State Department, is developing its full efficacy in the aftermath of the uprisings in West People's Republic of China that began only a few days before the start of the Torch Relay. Whereas the German media mainly reported on brutal attacks of the Chinese security forces, eye-witness accounts provide a different picture of what happened. The British journalist, James Miles ("The Economist"), who was in Lhasa from March 12 - 19, reports of pogrom-like attacks by Tibetan gangs on non-Tibetan members of the population of the city, among them the Muslim minority. According to Miles, the shops of Tibetan merchants were marked and left unscathed while all other shops were plundered, destroyed or set afire.[9] In one building alone five textile saleswomen were burned to death. Besides Miles, western tourists also described the attacks on non-Tibetans. One Canadian saw how a group of Tibetans beat a Chinese motorcyclist and proceeded to "mercilessly" stone him. "Eventually they got him on the ground, they were hitting him on the head with stones until he lost consciousness. I believe that young man was killed,'' reported the tourist.[10]
Manipulations
Whereas Miles was describing the reluctant reactions of the Chinese security forces in an interview broadcast over CNN, the German media is using the uprisings as a backdrop to represent brutal Chinese repression. Facts obviously play a subordinate role. In the meantime, television channels and daily journals have had to admit manipulations of pictures. Film sequences with Nepalese policemen beating demonstrators were sold as documentation of alleged Chinese police attacks.[11] The security forces' saving a boy from an attacking Tibetan mob was coarsely labeled a violent arrest. Even Miles' report was editorially presented in a context to focus on Chinese repression. For the purpose of comparison, german-foreign-policy.com documents excerpts of a CNN interview with the British journalist as well as the corresponding passage from a renowned German daily.[12] (Click here.)
Anticipation
The pogrom-like mob-violence not only created the necessary media profile for the current Tibet campaign, initiated with the help of the Friedrich Naumann Foundation, it also permits an insight into the character of Tibetan separatism. The "prime minister" of the Tibetan "Exile Government," who had participated in the formulation of the plan of action at the May 2007 Tibet Conference in Brussels, had already at the end of the 1990s, expounded in the German media on his views of the future of non-Tibetans, who had immigrated to Tibet over the past 50 years. In the case of a successful secession, they will have to "return to China, or if they would like to remain, be treated as foreigners." He explained the planned measures: "they will, in any case, not be allowed to participate in the political life."[13] The prospect of discrimination against all non-Tibetan members of the population was anticipated in mid-March by mobs in their bloody attacks on Chinese and members of the Muslim minority.
Please read also Strategies of Attrition (I), Strategies of Attrition (II), Strategies of Attrition (III), Strategies of Attrition (IV) and The Olympic Lever.
[1] Doug Saunders: How three Canadians upstaged Beijing; Globe and Mail 29.03.2008. Die Konferenz wurde von der Friedrich-Naumann-Stiftung in Zusammenarbeit mit der selbsternannten tibetischen Exilregierung und einem interfraktionellen Zusammenschluss des belgischen Parlaments durchgeführt.
[2] Die ersten vier "International Tibet Support Groups Conferences" fanden 1990 (Dharamsala), 1996 (Bonn), 2000 (Berlin) und 2003 (Prag) statt. Bereits die zweite Konferenz wurde von der Friedrich-Naumann-Stiftung organisiert.
[3] Gerhardt kritisiert Belgien nach Absage des Dalai-Lama-Besuchs; www.fnst-freiheit.org 11.05.2007
[4] Brussels Tibet conference roadmap for peace in Tibet; www.tibet.com 14.05.2007
[5] Valedictory Speech, International Tibet Support Groups Conference 5th, Dr. h.c. Rolf Berndt, Executive Director, Friedrich-Naumann-Stiftung fuer die Freiheit,Brussels, 14th May 2007
[6], [7}, [8] Doug Saunders: How three Canadians upstaged Beijing; Globe and Mail 29.03.2008
[9] Transcript: James Miles interview on Tibet; CNN 20.03.2008
[10] Chinese beaten mercilessly - tourists; Herald Sun 19.03.2008
[11] Fotos aus Tibet; Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung 24.03.2008
[12] see also Augenzeuge
[13] "99 Prozent der Tibeter vertrauen in Seine Heiligkeit"; Berliner Zeitung 20.10.1997. ?hnlich hat sich erst kürzlich der Dalai Lama ge?u?ert. "Alle Chinesen, die Tibetisch sprechen und die tibetische Kultur respektieren, k?nnen bleiben", sagte er einer deutschen Zeitung - mit einer Einschr?nkung: "sofern es nicht zu viele sind". "China mischt sich auch in Deutschlands Angelegenheiten ein"; Süddeutsche Zeitung 21.09.2007
|
|
| [8] 标题：德国网站称美德政府与达赖合导西藏闹剧 |
| 发表评论人：[游客]tnt [2008-4-17 10:15:12] |
德国网站称美德政府与达赖合导西藏闹剧
DWNEWS.COM-- 2008年4月14日4:9:26(京港台时间) --多维新闻网
西方达赖联手,合导西藏闹剧(chinesenewsnet.com)
德国外交政策网站近日刊登文章披露，美国国务院、德国弗里德里希－瑙曼基金会（瑙曼基金会）以及“西藏流亡政府”去年5月共同制定了一套利用西藏问题掀起反华浪潮的“行动计划”，计划在奥运火炬传递期间采取能产生公众效应的行动，并使抗议活动在8月北京奥运会期间达到高潮。据新华社柏林12日电(chinesenewsnet.com)
德国外交政策网站8日刊载题为《奥运火炬传递运动》的报道称，据会议纪录及一名加拿大记者调查，德国外交部一个前沿组织，在“反华西藏运动”的准备工作中扮演著重要的角色。(chinesenewsnet.com)
2007年5月，弗里德里希－瑙曼基金会(Friedrich Naumann Foundation)（附属于德国自由民主党German Free Democratic Party[FDP]）于去年5月11日至14日在布鲁塞尔召开“声援西藏团体第五次国际会议”。会议中促成当前的“反华西藏运动”，该运动在巴黎用暴力迫使奥运火炬传递中断。(chinesenewsnet.com)
这个在很大程度上由德国政府提供资金的瑙曼基金会，在05年3月开始筹备这次会议，并与在印度达兰萨拉的达赖喇嘛协调行动。最后有来自56个国家的300多人参加了这次会议，36个西藏团体和145个西藏支持组织也派代表出席。(chinesenewsnet.com)
“西藏流亡政府总理”出席(chinesenewsnet.com)
根据基金会的资料，这次会议与其前四次会议一样，强调“应该协调国际西藏支持组织的工作，加强其与西藏中央流亡政府的联系”。(chinesenewsnet.com)
该次会议经过多天商谈后，达成一份“行动计划”。这份计划被命名为“未来数年西藏运动路线图(Roadmap for the Tibet Movement for the Coming Years)”。它涉及四大议题包括：“为谈判提供政治支持”、“人权”、“环境与发展”和“2008年北京奥运会”。(chinesenewsnet.com)
是次会议的决议有著特殊意义，原因不仅是参与者人数众多，还因为这些决议是由富有影响力的政治家参与的，包括“西藏流亡政府”“总理”桑东仁波切。在场的还有美国副国务卿、西藏问题特别协调员葆拉．多布里扬斯基(Paula Dobriansky)。她属于布什政府中新保守派核心圈内的人物，被视为有能力达到目的的强硬派。(chinesenewsnet.com)
“行动”于京奥期间达高峰(chinesenewsnet.com)
据瑙曼基金会的负责人罗尔夫．贝恩特(Rolf Berndt)称，奥运会是公开宣传“西藏运动”的“极好机会”。与会者就此达成一致意见，即在未来15个月里，奥运会将成为其行动的主要攻击点。他们并且为此聘用了一名全职的组织者，从那以后，该组织者便在华盛顿的总部指挥世界性的“反华西藏运动”。它们计划在奥运火炬传递期间采取能产生公众效应的行动，并打算将行动在8月北京奥运会期间推至高峰。(chinesenewsnet.com)
据该记者调查，“反华西藏运动”在去年夏天已经启动，并开展了相当成功的行动。一名女性成员早在2007年8月初，就在北京北部游客众多的长城边上组织了一次吸引公众目光的行动。她与“西藏流亡政府”保持著紧密的联系。(chinesenewsnet.com)
另一名成员不久前指挥了对希腊圣火采集仪式的破坏活动。华盛顿总部也在操纵其他破坏火炬传递的“抗议”。该运动的行动更将在8月奥运会期间到达高潮，一名激进分子说：“我们决心每天（奥运期间）都在北京市中心开展非暴力活动。”
|
|
| [7] 标题： |
| 发表评论人：小水獭 [2008-4-17 3:42:52] |
真是美国的芙蓉姐姐
博主回复：还是觉得更像是美国的张召忠教授。:)
|
|
| [6] 标题：这美国小子是火上浇油 |
| 发表评论人：[游客]可真 [2008-4-17 2:18:48] |
中国人以及海外华人已经被西方媒体的歪曲报道及其他相关事情所激怒了,而这位美国小子却还在这个时候讲这种混话,引起中国人普遍愤怒是自然而必然的,外交部对国人的民族主义情绪不能不有所表示.这种情绪是非理性的,很难用理性的办法去控制它.如果西方针对奥运会及西藏问题的反华活动再进一步升级,中国的民族主义情绪可能普遍高涨起来甚至达到失控的地步,这是很危险的.
博主回复：老周，如果不理性的是敌人，倒也无妨。不理性的是自己，那就麻烦了。中国政府动不动就要对他国民间的言论和活动进行反应，才是最危险的事。我倒不觉得一般中国老百姓对此有点意见是什么问题。
|
|
| [5] 标题： |
| 发表评论人：[游客]西藏问题为导火索 [2008-4-16 17:00:36] |
转贺卫方教授答德国之声：
我有点儿担心的是西藏问题会不会成为中国改革进程中的一个障碍，一个向后拉的力量。我这几天见到一些德国的议员，我都表达了这样的忧虑。西方政府和政治家现在有很大的责任，如何与中国交往，不要为了迎合本国民众，一味说一些很激烈的话。这样会引发中国政府更加强烈的反弹，会激发中国国内的民族主义情绪，使得中国的改革进程停滞，甚至倒退。
|
|
| [4] 标题： |
| 发表评论人：[游客]支持 [2008-4-16 14:53:45] |
| 地球还是继续自转，太阳还是会照样东升西落，奥运会也会照常进行。什么是媒体，不就是炒作吗？中国的各大媒体也都把这件事放在最显眼的位置，虽然不排除有偏见的成分，但难免有炒作嫌疑？
|
|
| [3] 标题： |
| 发表评论人：[游客]有一说一 [2008-4-16 10:58:51] |
| 王老师的意识很清楚，抗议也要有个对等。胡哥对Bush，戴秉国对Rice，外交部对国务院，愤青对愤青，张召忠对Cafferty。不能自乱阵脚。
|
|
| [2] 标题：这回不能骂"愤青" |
| 发表评论人：[游客]鬼子来了 [2008-4-16 10:36:58] |
你是真不知道还是装蒜? 几乎整个西方社会, 从政府首脑, 到政客, 到媒体的嫖客, 到知识分子, 到年轻人... 他们对中国的态度, 对西藏事件的认识, 言论几乎高度一致, 这在那所谓的民主社会实在是个奇迹!
想想为啥? 连南韩那位在联合国任职的也出来发飙. 不来参加奥运咋的? 早先就不该请他, 他以为自己是个蒜苗, 充其量就是在美军裤裆下长大的一个杂交品种!
|
|
| [1] 标题： |
| 发表评论人：[游客]文革再现？ [2008-4-16 0:03:23] |
这些日子闹得风风雨雨，国人乐在其中，做为从愤青－民主人士－实用主义转变的青年，以前很不解文化大革命怎么会发生，怎么能发生？
从最近的一片喊打喊杀声里，我似乎发现了什么，也对中国人丧失了信心和理解。
与其别人的双手沾满自己的鲜血，不如自己双手沾满别人的鲜血。
|
|
|